0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½É¸®»çȸÀû ÁßÀç°¡ °£È£´ëÇлýÀÇ ½ºÆ®·¹½º Áö°¢, ´ëó¹æ¹ý, ½ºÆ®·¹½º ¹ÝÀÀ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â È¿°ú

Effects of Psychosocial Stress Management on Stress and Coping in Student Nurses

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2004³â 16±Ç 1È£ p.90 ~ 101
KMID : 0367020040160010090
±èÁ¶ÀÚ ( Kim Cho-Ja ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

ÇãÇý°æ ( Hur Hea-Kung ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ¿øÁÖÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú
°­´öÈñ ( Kang Duk-Hee ) - ¹Ì±¹ University of Alabama at Birmingham
±èº¸È¯ ( Kim Bo-Hwan ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose was to examine the effectiveness of a psychosocial stress management program on stress and coping in student nurses.

Method: A nonequivalent control group pre-posttest design was used. A convenience sample of 24 students from the Department of Nursing Wonju College of Medicine Yonsei University were assigned to experimental (n=12) and control groups (n=12). Stress was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (10 points) and blood cortisol. Coping was measured using a scale modified by So (1995) based on the Ways of Coping Checklist developed by Folkman and Lazarus (1985). Depression was measured using the CES-D by Radloff (1977) and state anxiety using the State Anxiety Inventory by Spielberger (1976). The psychosocial stress management program included education relaxation (Korean Dan Jeon-typed Breathing and music) and social support.

Result: Results showed for the two groups 1) a significant difference in stress scores (U= 19.50 p=0.002) 2) no difference in cortisol levels (8am 4pm) 3) a significant difference in problem-focused coping (U=25.50 p=0.007) 4) no difference in emotion-focused coping and 5) no difference in state anxiety and depression.

Conclusion: By utilizing the program students were able to learn how to control their stress and improve their coping. Therefore with a partial modification psychosocial stress management can be useful for continual management of stress in student nurses.
KeyWords
½ºÆ®·¹½º ´ëó, ½É¸®»çȸÀû ÁßÀç
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed